Back

Share Link

Test Arbitrum Hackathon

This is a test hackathon for Mantle

Hackathon State

Ended

Ended

newbie

Host by

Mantle Network

Hackathon Mode

ONLINE

Ecosystem

All

Tech Stack

Rust

Solidity

Participants

EHB

Links

Community

2,800 USD

Available in Prizes

General Track1,800 USDT

AI Track1,000 USDT

Description

Welcome to the Arbitrum Mini Hackathon, where innovation meets the power of scalability!

This hackathon is your gateway to exploring the Arbitrum ecosystem, a leading Layer-2 solution designed to bring unparalleled speed and cost efficiency to Ethereum. Whether you're a seasoned developer or just starting your Web3 journey, this event is your chance to dive deep into decentralized applications (dApps), showcase your skills, and push the boundaries of what's possible in blockchain technology.

Over the course of this hackathon, you'll have the opportunity to:

Build on Arbitrum's Optimistic Rollup technology, leveraging its low fees and high throughput.
Collaborate with like-minded developers, creatives, and innovators.
Learn from mentors and workshops tailored to guide you through the intricacies of the Arbitrum ecosystem.
Compete for exciting prizes and gain recognition in the Web3 community.

So gear up, get creative, and let's bring your ideas to life on Arbitrum! Together, we’re building the decentralized future—faster, cheaper, and smarter.

Let the hacking begin! 🚀

FAQs

Who can participate?

Do I need prior experience with Arbitrum to participate?

How do I register for the hackathon?

Can’t find what you’re looking for? Reach out to us!

Twitter

General Track

1,800 USDT

General Track

First Place1,000 USDT

Second Place500 USDT

Third Place200 USDT

Fourth Place100 USDT

General Track

Judging Criteria

To ensure a fair and transparent evaluation process, projects will be judged based on the following criteria:

1. Innovation and Creativity (25%)

Does the project bring a novel solution or idea to the table?
How creatively does the project leverage Arbitrum's technology?
Does it address a real-world problem or open up new use cases in Web3?

2. Technical Implementation (30%)

Is the codebase functional and well-structured?
How effectively does the project utilize Arbitrum's Layer-2 technology?
Are the smart contracts secure and efficient?
Is the project fully operational or close to being deployable?

3. User Experience and Design (20%)

Is the project intuitive and user-friendly?
Does it offer a seamless experience for users interacting with the dApp?
How visually appealing and polished is the design?

4. Impact and Use Case (15%)

Does the project have a clear and compelling use case?
How impactful is the project in solving a specific problem or enhancing the Web3 ecosystem?
Can it scale to reach a broader audience?

5. Presentation and Pitch (10%)

Was the project presented clearly and concisely?
Did the team effectively communicate the vision, functionality, and potential of their project?
Was the pitch engaging and well-structured?

Bonus Points:

Use of Arbitrum Ecosystem Tools: Extra points for integrating Arbitrum-native tools or partner technologies.
Team Collaboration: Teams that demonstrate strong collaboration and diverse skill sets may receive additional recognition.

Scoring System:
Each criterion will be scored on a scale of 1 to 10 by judges, with weighted percentages applied. The project with the highest total score will be declared the winner.

Good luck, and may the best project win! 🚀

Judging Mode

Users + Judges

Voting Mode

Fixed Number of Vote

Each Judge’s Votes

2800

Total Users Votes

1,200

Total Judges Votes

2,800

Judging Accounts

AA001

CCamerono

AI Track

1,000 USDT

AI Track

This will be distributed based on judges.

AI Track

Judging Criteria

To ensure a fair and transparent evaluation process, projects will be judged based on the following criteria:

1. Innovation and Creativity (25%)

Does the project bring a novel solution or idea to the table?
How creatively does the project leverage Arbitrum's technology?
Does it address a real-world problem or open up new use cases in Web3?

2. Technical Implementation (30%)

Is the codebase functional and well-structured?
How effectively does the project utilize Arbitrum's Layer-2 technology?
Are the smart contracts secure and efficient?
Is the project fully operational or close to being deployable?

3. User Experience and Design (20%)

Is the project intuitive and user-friendly?
Does it offer a seamless experience for users interacting with the dApp?
How visually appealing and polished is the design?

4. Impact and Use Case (15%)

Does the project have a clear and compelling use case?
How impactful is the project in solving a specific problem or enhancing the Web3 ecosystem?
Can it scale to reach a broader audience?

5. Presentation and Pitch (10%)

Was the project presented clearly and concisely?
Did the team effectively communicate the vision, functionality, and potential of their project?
Was the pitch engaging and well-structured?

Bonus Points:

Use of Arbitrum Ecosystem Tools: Extra points for integrating Arbitrum-native tools or partner technologies.
Team Collaboration: Teams that demonstrate strong collaboration and diverse skill sets may receive additional recognition.

Scoring System:
Each criterion will be scored on a scale of 1 to 10 by judges, with weighted percentages applied. The project with the highest total score will be declared the winner.

Good luck, and may the best project win! 🚀

Judging Mode

Judges Only

Voting Mode

Project Scoring

MAX Votes Per Project Per User/Judge

100

Judging Accounts

DDongkia

AAlex

Disclaimer：

HackQuest, as a hackathon platform provider, is not involved in the final judging and reward distribution for any hackathon unless specifically stated otherwise. If no or few submissions meet the host's quality standards, the prize may be subject to change.